Let’s Get FigDish to Dance The Jig!
Reading through guilter sub MakingAMurderer today fellow truther and freethinker lickety_snickum asked an astute question about why no one else’s DNA was found on the hood release of Teresa Halbach’s RAV4. First all of the predator guilters pretended that they never opened the hoods of their car:
Here is how PugslifeRules responded the the question:
You are past pathetic, can you read at all. “I take it for regular oil changes and maintenance.” Sorry unlike you I don’t open my hood and say, yup that’s an engine. Moron
User lets-shake-hands made a similar comment:
TH may never had opened the hood of her car. If she did she might have only opened it a couple of times over the years that she owned it. So the answer is no.
And on it went. When lickety_snickum sharpened his question a little more by asking what would explain why NO ONE else’s DNA but Steven Avery’s was found on the hood release, they shills stated getting even nastier while ignoring a question they apparently had no answer for. Figdish35 (who is a rich lawyer, and whose real name is Don Norton) snarkrs..
Is this dude’s point that it’s not really her car because her DNA isn’t under the hood, or is he arguing that there’s too much Avery DNA on it so it must have been planted? WTF?
See how Figdish deftly deflects and then counter punches with an uppercut of misdirection? He tries to come off all casual about it too, as though he just throwing out a remark off the cuff when in fact he is following the outlines of an agenda that is anything but casually executed
But I say we get Figdish35 to dance the jig? First, let him know where you found this information by linking back to this post. Second, let him know that you’re on to him as a shill for Manitowoc law enforcement. Second, demand that he answer the question about how only Steven Avery’s DNA could have been found on the hood release. Here is a link to the conversation in question And just sit back and watch Figdish35 dance.
Oh, one last thing…there is a whole long story about the hood latch if you want more information about how that evidence was planted. No one could ever understand why the RAV4 was found with the battery cables disconnected. Well, what happened is that someone popped the hood of the RAV4 soon after it had arrived at the crime lab. Ken Kratz saw that the battery cables would be disconnected as a matter or protocol and then decided to say that the RAV4 was found with the cables disconnected.
The reason I know this is that when Steven’s pontiac was seized on November 6th 2005, the CASO actually records an officer seeking instruction about disconnecting the cables. He asks Kim Skorlinksky from DCI (from the state crime lab) this question:
You’ve got some kind of memo that if it’s inside its supposed to have the battery disconnected
And then you see that when the car was taken into evidence in Crivitz, they opened the hood, disconnected the battery cable, and then sealed it with initialed evidence tape